Original Source:
New source:
Don Oberdorfer, The Two Koreas: A Contemporary History, Revised and Updated, Basic Books (Perseus Books Group), 2001; paper, 521 pp.
Pp. 74-83.
My earlier comment, based only on Cumings, was as follows
This quote sounds plausible, and suggests a nugget of truth behind what I derided as Prof. Cumings's "conspiracy-mongering." The original "conspiracy-mongers" would be US officials following up on Kissinger's suggestion. Apparently one of them, knowing of Prof. Cumings's connections to Korea's far Left, as well as his eagerness to believe the worst about US policy, used him as a conduit for psychological pressure on the North Korean regime.
So do I owe Prof. Cumings an apology? No. He wrote his history 21 years after 1976, plenty of time to realize (1) he had been taken, and (2) there were good-faith reasons why US officials thought a strong answer to the provocation was necessary (even if BC did not agree with those reasons).
(A "Wag-the-dog" scenario of unnecessary, electorally-calculated war, despite its abundant Hollywood pedigree, would have been difficult to get away with in the 18 August 1976 incident, when so many officials, some leak-prone, were involved in decision-making.)